|
willits
Jun 19, 2007 23:44:01 GMT -5
Post by hembo36 on Jun 19, 2007 23:44:01 GMT -5
can he still be considered a rookie? anybody know what the cutoff is as far as games or at bats from a previous year?
|
|
|
willits
Jun 19, 2007 23:59:23 GMT -5
Post by astrobuddy on Jun 19, 2007 23:59:23 GMT -5
I know there is a formula, but I dont know what it is. However, he only had 45 at bats in 2006 so I would assume he is still considered a Rookie, for ROY balloting.
He is going to have to hit for some power if he is going to play LF. He is really a good player, but he is kinda David Ecksteinish. Although, this Angels team isnt in need of power.
|
|
|
willits
Jun 20, 2007 8:41:10 GMT -5
Post by chandler44 on Jun 20, 2007 8:41:10 GMT -5
From the 'net.
|
|
|
willits
Jun 20, 2007 17:37:14 GMT -5
Post by hembo36 on Jun 20, 2007 17:37:14 GMT -5
i think he will win it..
|
|
|
willits
Jun 20, 2007 21:09:20 GMT -5
Post by chandler44 on Jun 20, 2007 21:09:20 GMT -5
Probably between Willits, Pedroia, and Travis Buck at this point. Jeremy Guthrie has been good on the pitching side as well.
|
|
|
willits
Jun 20, 2007 21:44:37 GMT -5
Post by hembo36 on Jun 20, 2007 21:44:37 GMT -5
buck is another one having a great year..although the team he's on really makes him stand out due to the fact they suck...
|
|
|
willits
Jun 20, 2007 21:47:25 GMT -5
Post by astrobuddy on Jun 20, 2007 21:47:25 GMT -5
How does Oakland suck??
|
|
|
willits
Jun 20, 2007 21:48:02 GMT -5
Post by chandler44 on Jun 20, 2007 21:48:02 GMT -5
I think you're confused...Buck's on the A's, and they don't really suck this year.
|
|
|
willits
Jun 20, 2007 21:53:39 GMT -5
Post by hembo36 on Jun 20, 2007 21:53:39 GMT -5
oops..i stand corrected chandler...i was thinking royals for some reason..my bad
|
|
|
willits
Jun 20, 2007 21:56:11 GMT -5
Post by chandler44 on Jun 20, 2007 21:56:11 GMT -5
Probably thinking of JOHN Buck.
|
|