No HOF for Bags this time around

[djv]

So just the era alone doomed Bagwell to 41% of the vote.

I get the other two roid heads getting sh*t for votes but when you got nothing on a guy other then he was muscular then you cant hold it against him.

He'll get in but they are making him wait. Wait for what? Morons.

What a bunch of elite, snobby ass ****suckers the voters are.

Took Blyleven 14 years? What a joke.

sports.espn.go.com/mlb/hof11/news/story?id=5991808

[cangrejero]

Well deserved by Robbie Alomar

[djv]

Jan 5, 2011 19:50:38 GMT -5 cangrejero said:

Well deserved by Robbie Alomar

Absolutely. He was a given to make it after being told to stand in the corner for a year for the spitting incident and then come on in!

[changeup]

Jan 6, 2011 22:54:11 GMT -5 djv said:

Jan 5, 2011 19:50:38 GMT -5 cangrejero said:

Well deserved by Robbie Alomar

Absolutely. He was a given to make it after being told to stand in the corner for a year for the spitting incident and then come on in!

If Alomar deserved to be in the HOF, Bagwell does. I figure it will take Bagwell a few times to get in. Maybe if he had Spit on an umpire like Alomar, he would have received enough vstes.

[cangrejero]

Well, Alomar had that incident, but otherwise was a good person.
Also, he is one of top 3 second basemen in history, even better than Biggio.

Bagwell will be in the Hall of Fame, but will take him from 3 to 5 years. Maybe next year he could do it because the only good player is Larkin beside him.