|
|
ransom
Sept 8, 2007 23:52:06 GMT -5
Post by astrobuddy on Sept 8, 2007 23:52:06 GMT -5
Loretta and Lamb are NOT every day players. They are good bench/part time players.
Burke is a AAAA player. He will never be a good MLB player.
|
|
|
|
ransom
Sept 9, 2007 15:32:08 GMT -5
Post by vega51 on Sept 9, 2007 15:32:08 GMT -5
If AB says Burke is not a major leaguer, THEN I AM CONVINCED HE IS.
|
|
|
|
ransom
Sept 9, 2007 15:36:00 GMT -5
Post by astrobuddy on Sept 9, 2007 15:36:00 GMT -5
Me and everyone else in MLB.
I wondered how long it would take you to start with the personal attacks.
|
|
|
|
ransom
Sept 9, 2007 15:42:49 GMT -5
Post by vega51 on Sept 9, 2007 15:42:49 GMT -5
If you say he is NO major leaguer, then i am convinced he is, sorry.
|
|
|
|
ransom
Sept 9, 2007 15:44:34 GMT -5
Post by astrobuddy on Sept 9, 2007 15:44:34 GMT -5
We know you do.. You have been sucking his ass for 3 years. We read about it ad nausem every freaking game thread over and over and over.
... and you are wrong. Who or what will you blame it on in 2008?
|
|
|
|
ransom
Sept 9, 2007 15:48:52 GMT -5
Post by vega51 on Sept 9, 2007 15:48:52 GMT -5
If he starts, he will hit, HE HAS PROVEN that when he plays REGULARLY he hits.
Is a pity that you are UNABLE TO SEE IT, then again, you SAID the Berkman and Pujols are in the same league, that Vlad is not a Hall of Famer and Berkman is as good as Vlad.
Also, you said the Yankees were going nowhere, WRONG.
|
|
|
|
ransom
Sept 9, 2007 16:24:04 GMT -5
Post by chandler44 on Sept 9, 2007 16:24:04 GMT -5
When? He's had 1100+ plate appearances and he still hasn't proven squat. 99% of the people who've seen him play and have seen his stats now generally agree that he's not a very good player.
|
|
|
|
ransom
Sept 9, 2007 16:24:46 GMT -5
Post by vega51 on Sept 9, 2007 16:24:46 GMT -5
next year is going to be intersting, i think is going to be the arroyo thing AGAIN.
|
|
|
|
ransom
Sept 9, 2007 17:17:02 GMT -5
Post by astrobuddy on Sept 9, 2007 17:17:02 GMT -5
Where is the Arroyo now? Not sh*t is where he is.
|
|
|
|
ransom
Sept 9, 2007 17:24:17 GMT -5
Post by vega51 on Sept 9, 2007 17:24:17 GMT -5
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm, after the all star, 5 and 5, 3.74 ERA, 1.29 whip. For the year, 1.40 whip, do you realize that Oswalt's whip is 1.33?  ? One question, who would you take, Arroyo or Jennings? ??/ Or, Arroyo or Woody? Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm |
|
|
|
ransom
Sept 9, 2007 17:59:57 GMT -5
Post by astrobuddy on Sept 9, 2007 17:59:57 GMT -5
Here we go again... this month or 1/2 year or this week. Jennings has nothing to do with this because it wasnt Jennings or Arroyo or Woody. Typical Vega small sample size argument.
Bronson Arroyo is a career 55-58 pitcher with a 4.25 ERA.
Roy Oswalt is a career 112-53 pitcher with a 3.09 ERA.
hhhmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
|
|
|
|
ransom
Sept 9, 2007 18:14:57 GMT -5
Post by hembo36 on Sept 9, 2007 18:14:57 GMT -5
well theres zero comparison between arroyo and oswalt..lets dont even bring that up... oswalt is easily one of the top 3-4 pitchers in MLB..i personally think his track record and my opinion places him behind santana only..look at the last 4 or 5 years he is arguably one of the best in all of baseball..even peavy, who til this point has been hit or miss...arroyo has been with like 4 teams in 4 years or something..maybe not but theres zero similarity between the two
|
|
|
|
ransom
Sept 9, 2007 18:19:27 GMT -5
Post by vega51 on Sept 9, 2007 18:19:27 GMT -5
thing is, Mr. AB TRIED to insinuate that Arroyo is pitching bad, well, whip 1.40 for this year, oSWALT 1.33. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm Second, would you take Arroyo or Jennings? Woody or Arroyo? ??//// Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm |
|
|
|
ransom
Sept 9, 2007 18:22:57 GMT -5
Post by hembo36 on Sept 9, 2007 18:22:57 GMT -5
i knew what you guys were saying and i dont think arroyo is pitching bad at all...roy is pitching bad and is still one of the best.
I give credit where its due and oswalt at half azz is better than most at 100%..oswalt is a stud...i rarely dont even bother arguing when he is the topic because he is clearly awesome
|
|
