|
|
Post by jbarron on Oct 8, 2007 17:24:38 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by hembo36 on Oct 8, 2007 17:35:27 GMT -5
im not so sure i would have him on that one either..his track record lately hasnt been great...i think father time just caught up to him the past few season..arguably one of the best ever, if not the best stat wise, he just doesnt have it anymore....
on that note..before he rejoined the yankees this season he said he would explain why at the end..why he left the astros..if this season is any indication why he left..he need not even bother telling us why...it was all too clear
|
|
|
|
Post by crashtest on Oct 8, 2007 19:30:34 GMT -5
Roger and out. Don't let the door hit your hammy, Roger.
|
|
|
|
Post by hembo36 on Oct 8, 2007 19:40:30 GMT -5
Roger that and he'll miss pettitte's bat
|
|
|
|
Post by texiban001 on Oct 9, 2007 7:43:13 GMT -5
Don't you mean Pettites' bite? ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by crashtest on Oct 9, 2007 8:08:14 GMT -5
Don't you mean Pettites' bite? ;D Or maybe, Pettitte's butt  |
|
|
|
Post by texiban001 on Oct 9, 2007 9:23:06 GMT -5
LMAO! ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by jbarron on Oct 9, 2007 9:39:01 GMT -5
Nah, he hasn't been missing Pettitte's butt. That's why he re-signed with the Skanks in the first place.
|
|
|
|
Post by vega51 on Oct 9, 2007 12:10:41 GMT -5
With Torre gone, we may see Clemens back in Houston if they have any chance on winning next year.
Same applies with Pettitte
|
|
|
|
Post by astrobuddy on Oct 9, 2007 13:02:09 GMT -5
Clemens never pitches again and shouldnt. He is done. Stupid move if the Astros signed Clemens again. I would be ok with Pettitte, but no way does Clemens need to pitch again.
|
|
|
|
Post by chandler44 on Oct 9, 2007 13:46:43 GMT -5
People have been saying for 10 years now that he's 'done'. If you get a chance to sign him and McLane's willing to spend the money, I'd go for it. I'll take my chances on him in 2008 over some of the kids we have as options now. Besides, he'll be better just by having Everett behind him instead of Jeter.
|
|
|
|
Post by texiban001 on Oct 9, 2007 14:00:54 GMT -5
No way. Too much money for a guy who is going to be 46 next season and is beginning to have the problems associated with his age.
|
|
|
|
Post by chandler44 on Oct 9, 2007 14:25:46 GMT -5
Hey, it ain't my money he's spending, and as long as it's 'separate' from the regular team budget as he did in the past, how can it hurt?
|
|
|
|
Post by astrobuddy on Oct 9, 2007 16:15:54 GMT -5
Good point Chandler.. but isnt that the Biggio effect. He is taking a roster spot away from a young guy? Clemens wasnt good this year and he has been hurt for the last 3 seasons with the same ailment. Hamstring.
|
|
|
|
Post by hembo36 on Oct 9, 2007 18:26:27 GMT -5
absofckinglutely not..i wouldnt take him back for 100,000 fck that and him...His running off somewhere else shows what a team player he is..i would sign andy though..i think the astros screwed him
|
|
