|
Post by astrobuddy on Jun 24, 2007 11:44:13 GMT -5
Yes I do.
The 20 year limitation wouldnt apply to his crimes as they took place before the law was in effect.
|
|
|
Post by hembo36 on Jun 24, 2007 12:01:54 GMT -5
i admitted being wrong on the 10 year thing...let me come at you this way..from a standpoint of him being guilty, well, it sure as hell looks that way...On the defense side im sure they will play the time card thing...
Whether its 5, 8 or 10 years im wondering why they're just now reporting it? Theres more to this than what the newspaper is saying.. The fact he is being charged means little and you should know this
|
|
|
Post by chandler44 on Jun 24, 2007 12:13:09 GMT -5
I've read countless interviews and stories where the victims didn't report it at first or even at all because it was too painful to admit that it actually happened. Often they worry about how they'll be viewed by classmates, friends, etc and worry about being believed. Reporting a crime like that isn't as 'easy' as calling in and saying your lawnmower was stolen. It's a bit more personal.
|
|
|
Post by astrobuddy on Jun 24, 2007 12:17:55 GMT -5
hembo... it would be hard for me to explain that to you here, but victims of SA often dont come forward because of the stigma attached... Especially with children.
None of us know what evidence they have... but to just say he will walk is silly.
|
|
|
Post by hembo36 on Jun 24, 2007 13:48:26 GMT -5
;D ok... i see a civil victory here
|
|
|
Post by Coach on Jun 25, 2007 9:27:01 GMT -5
As a youth league coach myself, I detest that piece of sh*t Hall. That's f**ked up any way you slice it.
|
|