|
|
Scott
Jul 3, 2007 22:27:23 GMT -5
Post by 03flht2 on Jul 3, 2007 22:27:23 GMT -5
he's as bad at the plate as Ensberg and Burke, how long do they stick with this loser
|
|
|
|
Scott
Jul 3, 2007 22:29:10 GMT -5
Post by redbaron on Jul 3, 2007 22:29:10 GMT -5
he's as bad at the plate as Ensberg and Burke, how long do they stick with this loser This "loser" also has ten homers and is one of our better RBI guys. Who do we have to replace him...........nobody. |
|
|
|
Scott
Jul 3, 2007 22:29:39 GMT -5
Post by vega51 on Jul 3, 2007 22:29:39 GMT -5
i think he needs to get as many at bats as possible to see if he can be a regular in the future.
I think he is a number 4 OFer but we lose nothing by looking at him play for the rest of the season.
He K's too much and too many groud ball outs to the 2nd basemen. He is a pull hitter, will hit homers, will get walks with a very low average and nothing special defensively, probably below average outhere.
He is more like a number 4 OFer but lets see what happens.
|
|
|
|
Scott
Jul 4, 2007 8:33:32 GMT -5
Post by sadoug on Jul 4, 2007 8:33:32 GMT -5
For God's sake...lets keep Scott...he is not much good, but if he goes they might think of getting lane back
|
|
|
|
Scott
Jul 4, 2007 9:33:08 GMT -5
Post by redbaron on Jul 4, 2007 9:33:08 GMT -5
You are rigiht, Doug. We sure don't need that automatic out back in Houston.
|
|
|
|
Scott
Jul 6, 2007 17:59:46 GMT -5
Post by hembo36 on Jul 6, 2007 17:59:46 GMT -5
you have to give him a full season...just like burke...these young guys cant play if they're always looking over their shoulders..I know some of you agree with this...i mean how long did they give lane? 2-3 years? thats certainly long enough..how many times have they played outsberg?
|
|
|
|
Scott
Jul 8, 2007 16:19:39 GMT -5
Post by vega51 on Jul 8, 2007 16:19:39 GMT -5
Scott is a number 4 Of, Burke is a REGULAR second basemen and Ensberg should not be playing regular ball anywhere.
|
|
|
|
Scott
Jul 8, 2007 20:23:15 GMT -5
Post by hembo36 on Jul 8, 2007 20:23:15 GMT -5
burke isnt hitting any better? who would you play in the OF ahead of scott?
|
|
|
|
Scott
Jul 8, 2007 21:07:24 GMT -5
Post by vega51 on Jul 8, 2007 21:07:24 GMT -5
actually, the average is better and now that is playing MORE is hitting a lot better than Scott.
|
|
|
|
Scott
Jul 8, 2007 22:55:00 GMT -5
Post by hembo36 on Jul 8, 2007 22:55:00 GMT -5
because scott never plays now
|
|
|
|
Scott
Jul 9, 2007 16:04:45 GMT -5
Post by vega51 on Jul 9, 2007 16:04:45 GMT -5
well, i can say the same thing about burke, not that he is playing is hitting.
I believe Burke can be a much better than average player, actually, i can see a very good second basemen if they allow him to play.
|
|
|
|
Scott
Jul 9, 2007 16:13:44 GMT -5
Post by hembo36 on Jul 9, 2007 16:13:44 GMT -5
Id probably dump both of them if the situation presented itself.
|
|
|
|
Scott
Jul 9, 2007 16:17:49 GMT -5
Post by chandler44 on Jul 9, 2007 16:17:49 GMT -5
I personally wouldn't say that Burke's hitting 'a lot better' than Scott. His OPS is still 85 points under Scott's.
I also wouldn't say he'll be a very good 2b, too many holes in his game. We'll have to agree to disagree.
|
|
|
|
Scott
Jul 9, 2007 16:19:39 GMT -5
Post by hembo36 on Jul 9, 2007 16:19:39 GMT -5
He certainly will not strike comparisons to a young biggio..You can give hi mall the at bats in the world and he will never be remembered when his time is up
|
|
|
|
Scott
Jul 9, 2007 21:16:02 GMT -5
Post by vega51 on Jul 9, 2007 21:16:02 GMT -5
not many can compare to biggio, he is one of best 10 second basemen of ALL TIME.
So, is NOT fair to compare anyone to biggio. Now, he will hit .280 and .350 OBP with some pop IF allowed to play a whole year.
|
|
