|
Post by vega51 on Sept 24, 2007 19:51:42 GMT -5
he never bet against his team.
Betting on baseball is wrong, he is out of baseball but he BELONGS in the Hall of Fame.
Ok, don't have him making money on the baseball field, BUT HE BELONGS IN THE HALL.
|
|
|
Post by crashtest on Sept 24, 2007 20:03:24 GMT -5
Here's a better picture:
|
|
|
Post by astrobuddy on Sept 24, 2007 20:11:49 GMT -5
Anyone who doesnt know the difference between Mclane and Rose is a freaking Idiot and needs to have his baseball fan ID taken away.
|
|
|
Post by crashtest on Sept 24, 2007 20:24:40 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by vega51 on Sept 24, 2007 20:32:10 GMT -5
Crash, rose belongs in the hall, thats for sure.
|
|
|
Post by crashtest on Sept 24, 2007 20:57:37 GMT -5
Anyone who doesnt know the difference between Mclane and Rose is a freaking Idiot and needs to have his baseball fan ID taken away. And a homo sapiens whose cranial capacity is insufficient to perform analogous reasoning should shut the fnck up and climb back into whatever tree he fell out of and resume sniffing the finger he just pulled out of his a$$. vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&videoid=1077606005
|
|
|
Post by crashtest on Sept 25, 2007 8:03:40 GMT -5
Anyone who doesnt know the difference between Mclane and Rose is a freaking Idiot and needs to have his baseball fan ID taken away. I agree. McLane is definitely the worse of two evils. McLane intentionally altered proper winning strategy by not putting his best line-up on the field so he could fatten his wallet shilling tickets for Biggio's pursuit of 3k. Pete Rose bet on and FOR his team which MIGHT have caused him to alter his strategy - which strategy MIGHT not have been in his team's long-term best interests. It will take this team at least half a decade to recover from McLane's folly.
|
|
|
Post by chandler44 on Sept 25, 2007 8:32:47 GMT -5
You've got issues.
Playing Biggio over Burke will take at least 5 years to recover from?? Deal in hyperbola much?
|
|
|
Post by vega51 on Sept 25, 2007 10:23:13 GMT -5
playingBiggio over Burke over the last 3 years is STUPID.
|
|
|
Post by south on Sept 25, 2007 18:00:31 GMT -5
You have an argument for 06 & 07, but benching a productive player for a non-productive one would be a weird move in the middle of a pennant race. Burke recieved pretty regular time in 05 in LF anyway.
|
|
|
Post by crashtest on Sept 25, 2007 18:27:45 GMT -5
You've got issues. Playing Biggio over Burke will take at least 5 years to recover from?? Deal in hyperbola much? It wasn't simply a matter of Biggio over Burke straight up. It caused Pence not to break ST with the club and it put Burke in CF instead where he was way out of position. It caused Biggio to be put in the lead off spot which was a disaster. The lineup was completely out of sync the entire year because of the accomodations made for Biggio. We are going to have to start from scratch next year. The bench was an ill-defined mess. Who is the second beman next year? Who is utility? Are we going to have a black hole of Burke/Everett/C/P agin next year. Some of those questions could have and should have been answered this year.
|
|
|
Post by chandler44 on Sept 25, 2007 18:29:47 GMT -5
Starting Biggio didn't deny the team the ability of finding any of those answers.
|
|
|
Post by crashtest on Sept 25, 2007 18:52:39 GMT -5
Yes it did ....No it didn't ...... Yes it did ........No it didn't....Yes it did ....No it didn't ...... Yes it did ........No it didn't........Yes it did ....No it didn't ...... Yes it did ........No it didn't....Yes it did ....No it didn't ...... Yes it did ........No it didn't
You just have to have the last word, don't you?
|
|
|
Post by chandler44 on Sept 25, 2007 19:40:45 GMT -5
What, exactly, would you call the point of you posting that, if not to try to have the last word?
Your hypocrisy knows no bounds. It's funny that it's ok for you to spout your opinions and your vile crap filled with references to feces, but when I post *my* opinions, you get your panties in a wad.
So, I'm going to play your game. Feel free to have the last word. I *know* you can't wait to respond to me with references to sh*t, corn, corn in sh*t, peanuts in sh*t, or simply a video of a monkey smelling sh*t on his finger, or perhaps you just want to respond with a bunch of 'f yous' and random attempts at insult. Be my guest. I've wasted enough time on responding to you.
|
|
|
Post by crashtest on Sept 25, 2007 20:09:56 GMT -5
"I've wasted enough time on responding to you"
Dear God, my prayers have been answered. Thank you, thank you, thank you.
|
|