|
Post by astrobuddy on Jul 1, 2007 13:37:36 GMT -5
8 earned in 1.2 innings.
I guess we will hear about a bum elbow shortly.
hhhhhmmmmmmmmm
|
|
|
Post by vega51 on Jul 1, 2007 14:05:18 GMT -5
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm, still better than woody, RIGHT? ?
|
|
|
Post by astrobuddy on Jul 1, 2007 14:07:14 GMT -5
Maybe, maybe not.
Whats his record and ERA now?
|
|
|
Post by vega51 on Jul 1, 2007 14:09:29 GMT -5
ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, because pettitte pitched one awful game, in the AL you are comparing numbers? hmmmmm, silly mistake i believe
|
|
|
Post by astrobuddy on Jul 1, 2007 14:14:49 GMT -5
Is Pettitte worth $32 million?
|
|
|
Post by vega51 on Jul 1, 2007 14:16:31 GMT -5
yes, because pettite meant clemens also.
I prefer this rotation:
1. Oswalt 2. Pettitte 3. Clemens 4. Woody Williams 5. Hirsh
over what we have right now.
|
|
|
Post by astrobuddy on Jul 1, 2007 14:19:06 GMT -5
YOU would have a bad rotation. Andy is hurt and Clemens is done. A waste of $50 million.
|
|
|
Post by vega51 on Jul 1, 2007 14:21:47 GMT -5
noooooooooooooooo, clemens i KNEW would struggle in the AL, not in the NL.
I am on record saying if he signed with Yankees his ERA was going to be over 4.00, same with Andy, why? Because AL is better.
They did not go over there for individual records, they wanted to win.
With the Astros the numbers would had been better.
|
|
|
Post by astrobuddy on Jul 1, 2007 14:29:18 GMT -5
They went for the money and the NY thing. They damn sure arent winning.
|
|
|
Post by vega51 on Jul 1, 2007 14:41:11 GMT -5
they saw BETTER chance to win there than in Houston.
|
|
|
Post by astrobuddy on Jul 1, 2007 15:06:39 GMT -5
If thats what you coose to think.
|
|
|
Post by vega51 on Jul 1, 2007 15:12:30 GMT -5
yep
|
|
|
Post by chandler44 on Jul 1, 2007 15:18:58 GMT -5
IT's all about the money.
|
|
|
Post by astrobuddy on Jul 1, 2007 15:19:07 GMT -5
They were wrong.
|
|
|
Post by vega51 on Jul 1, 2007 15:29:06 GMT -5
not really, have you seen the astros this year? ??
|
|